Here is a list of the world's most expensive engineering projects with estimated costs and short descriptions of each project (sources: iCivilEngineer, China Daily, Wikipedia). Some of the projects are already completed, some are under construction, so the cost estimates are not definitive. This list is also under construction: if you know big engineering projects which are not listed, please post your comments.
5. Gerald R. Ford Class Aircraft Carrier: 8.1 billion USD
Artist’s concept of CVN 21 one of a new class of aircraft carriers
The Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers (CVN-78) will be the next generation supercarrier for the United States Navy. Construction began in the spring of 2007, and is planned to finish in 2015. With the addition of the most modern equipment and automation they will reduce the crew requirement and the total cost of future aircraft carriers.
Carriers of the Ford class will incorporate many new design features: new nuclear reactor design, stealthier features to reduce radar profile, electromagnetic catapults, advanced arresting gear, and reduced crewing requirements. It will be constructed at Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding in Virginia, the only shipyard in the U.S. capable of building nuclear powered aircraft carriers. It is estimated to cost at least $8.1 billion excluding the $5 billion spent on research and development. A total of three carriers has been authorized for construction, but eleven carriers could be constructed over the life of the program.
4. Big Dig, Boston: 14.6 billion USD
Interstate I-93 Tunnel in Boston, part of the Big Dig; photography by Rene Schwietzke
The Big Dig is a megaproject that rerouted the Central Artery, the chief highway through the heart of Boston, into a 3.5 mile tunnel under the city. When the project concluded on December 31, 2007, it was the most expensive highway project in the U.S. The project incurred criminal arrests, escalating costs, death, leaks, and charges of poor execution and use of substandard materials.
This project was developed in response to traffic congestion on Boston's streets, which were laid out before the advent of the automobile. The project faced several environmental and engineering obstacles. The area through which the tunnels were to be dug was largely landfill, and included existing subway lines, pipes and utility lines, many unexpected geological barriers, glacial debris, foundations of buried houses, sunken ships, etc. Unusual engineering challenges required unusual solutions and methods to address them. Engineers figured out the safest way to build the tunnel without endangering the existing highway above.
By the January 13, 2006, Big Dig was completed. It remains the largest and most complex highway and tunnel project in the nation's history.
3. Three Gorges Dam, China: 24 billion USD
Three Gorges Dam in construction 2002; photography by Frank Matthes
The Three Gorges Dam is a hydroelectric river dam that spans the Yangtze River in Sandouping, China. This is the largest hydroelectric power station in the world. The original plan of the project was completed in 2008. Six additional generators in the underground power plant will be installed until around 2011, when total electric generating capacity of the dam will reach 22,500 MW.
Some interesting facts: the concrete dam wall is 2,309 meters long, 101 meters high, 115 meters thick on the bottom and 40 meters thick on top. The project used 27,200,000 cubic meters of concrete, 463,000 tonnes of steel (enough to build 63 Eiffel Towers), and moved about 102,600,000 cubic meters of earth. When the water level is maximum at 91 meters above river level, the reservoir created by the Three Gorges Dam is about 660 kilometers in length and 1.12 kilometers in width on average. The total surface area of the reservoir is 1045 km2. The reservoir will flood a total area of 632 km2 of land.
The dam provides a vast amount of clean electricity, controls flooding, and enhances navigation. However, it has also flooded cultural and archaeological sites, displaced more than million people, and is causing dramatic ecological changes. The decision to build the dam has been deeply controversial.
2. Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository Project: 57 billion USD
Looking west atop Yucca Mountain towards Beatty and Death Valley
The U.S. Department of Energy have been studying Yucca Mountain, Nevada, since 1978 to determine whether it would be suitable for a long-term geologic repository for high-level radioactive waste, a result of nuclear power generation and national defense programs. Yucca Mountain is located in a remote desert within the secure boundaries of the Nevada Test Site in Nye County, 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas.
Yucca Mountain was created by several large eruptions from a caldera volcano and is composed of layers of tuff. Tuff has special physical and chemical characteristics that make it a suitable material to entomb radioactive waste for the hundreds of thousands of years required for the waste to become safe through radioactive decay. After 20 years of research and carefully planned scientific field work, the Department of Energy has found that the repository brings together the location and natural barriers most likely to protect the safety of the public, including those Americans living in the immediate vicinity.
The Obama Administration rejected the use of the site in the 2009 United States Federal Budget proposal, which would eliminate all funding except that needed to answer inquiries from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, while the Administration devises a new strategy toward nuclear waste disposal. On March 5, 2009, Energy Secretary told a Senate hearing that the Yucca Mountain site no longer was viewed as an option for storing reactor waste.
1. International Space Station: 80 billion USD
International Space Station as seen from the departing Space Shuttle Atlantis; source: NASA
The International Space Station (ISS) is a joint project among the space agencies of the United States (NASA), Japan (JAXA), Russia (RKA), Canada (CSA) and the European Space Agency. The space station is in a low Earth orbit, at an altitude of 350 km, and you can see it from Earth's surface even with the naked eye.
The International Space Station is the largest research laboratory ever launched into orbit. Long-term expedition crews conduct science across a variety of fields: life sciences, human research, Earth observation, physical sciences, education and technology demonstrations. Scientific findings are being published every month. ISS provides educational opportunities for students back home on Earth, including educational demonstrations, student-developed experiments, student participation in ISS experiments, ISS engineering activities, and NASA investigator experiments.
As a multinational project, the financial and legal aspects of the ISS are complex. Giving a precise cost estimate is not straightforward, because it is not easy to determine which costs should actually be attributed to the programme. Cost estimates range from 35 billion to 100 billion USD. The ESA estimates €100 billion for the entire station over a period of 30 years.
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
your figures for Yucca Mountain are out of date. The U.S. Department of Energy issued a revised estimate in August 2008 -- $96.2 billion.
ReplyDeletehttp://usgovinfo.about.com/od/technologyandresearch/a/yuccacost.htm
The estimates for Yucca Mountain are based upon 150 year lifecycle once built.
ReplyDeleteAccording to the US DOE, the cost for the expected life cycle of the Program (150 years, between 1983 and 2133) is projected to be $96 billion in 2007 dollars - so far "only" $9.5 billion has been spent on the project -- so it is second to last on your list - see the DOE site http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ym_repository/index.shtml#4
Australian government's Fibre to the Node project for 90% of Australian houses: AUD 43 billion. MASSIVE.
ReplyDeleteInteresting article, I enjoyed reading it.
ReplyDeleteI go through that tunnel all the time. Problem is that on each side of the tunnel, there's a ton of traffic. The big dig simply split the traffic and pushed it 2 miles each way.
ReplyDeleteDOLLARS SPENT WILL NOT BE THE BIGGEST COST!
ReplyDeleteWhen considering the total dollars spent on the Yucca Mountain Project to date, it is only fair to take the time to consider what portion has been spent due simply to political opposition insisting they re-study, re-calculate, re-model everything even after determinations were reached by the experts responsible for determining where in the entire US was the best place for the entire US to store and safely monitor any nuclear waste.
It was known by the scientists and experts on the project (and stated loud and clear) to be unnecessary to continue testing back in 1998 - and yet more than ten years and BILLIONs of dollars later - they have in fact reached the same determination...Yucca Mountain is the best location for all of us in this country to get the waste to and have it stored and monitored by the experts we need to give the respect to for knowing how to deal with it!
The Yucca Mtn Project has been convenient for politicians to be against, because we in the public are quite ignorant to the major advantages of nuclear as the truly awesome (tried and true, abundant, convenient, inexpensive, without ties to countries that hold us over the barrel, and so on...) power source that it is.
We have to stop looking at nuclear as a huge, nasty mushroom cloud. France, Japan and other countries respect nuclear energy and are utilizing it far beyond the U.S. Sad that the U.S. is responsible for the advancement of nuclear technology, and we are being passed by in the utilization of it!
Mark my words that there will in deed need to be a safe, secure, well monitored place to have nuclear waste end up - and the experts that have been studying it and determined Yucca Mountain to be the best place within and for this entire country - have been trying to get all of us to understand and respect them in their findings and determination on this subject. I don't believe many of them have liked spending the last ten years and billions of dollars to come to the same conclusions!
Every single person in this country needs to be wanting nuclear anything to be dealt with by the nuclear experts. It is not about not in my backyard, but about in the best backyard for this entire country. I live in Nevada and because I now have a way above average understanding of the nuclear energy subject, I am comfortable bowing to the experts and letting them determine how and where it should be handled, dealt with, etc.
I would rather have it in my backyard - if the experts who study it have determined it's the best backyard in the entire country - cuz that makes it the safest for everyone in the entire country!
It is tough to think about how the billions of dollars could have been being spent since 1998 to come to the same conclusion.
And, how much it has cost us in this State to not yet have the repository here...jobs, economic advantages that were offered to each Nevadan - that we were conveniently never privy to, etc.
The cost is far more than the dollars cited, and I believe that it will ultimately end up at Yucca Mountain whether for even more temporary a stay because ends up being reprocessed.
These are waaaaay off... You should check spending for some of the US defense projects... I can think of two that out spent the total of this whole list... epic failure....
ReplyDeleteAnd where is the LHC?
ReplyDeleteIs the Gerald R. Ford Class Aircraft Carrier more expensive than Large Hadron Collider in the Cern?... mmmm... I don't think so.
Hi from Spain.
I enjoy eating meat sandwiches.
ReplyDeleteWe could avoid the long term radioactive storage problem or at least make it smaller if we would give more consideration to separation and breeding. I believe scientists at Sandia and Los Alamos have worked on these problems and there are solutions. But too many people say "Oh no, we can't do that", even though I believe France, Japan and Russia all have used fuel rod reprocessing capabilities. Breeding nonradioactive isotopes is just the inverse of the processes currently used to make radioactive isotopes and we've done it for decades. What we need to do is industrialize it so we can do it in bulk.
ReplyDeleteAny list like this would be remiss without a mention of the Apollo project. At the height of the program, it represented 5% of the American federal budget. The total came to $20-25 billion in 1969 or $135 billion in 2005 dollars.
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_project#Program_costs_and_cancellation
yucca is a joke. It is bad PR at its worst. It has tested positive for water for the last 10 years and it has been in the process on containment why the price tag blew up. The entire concept is lead and concrete boxes that can not possible have water (ie why they picked a desert) but they failed. It would be just as safe at the nuclear facilitates that made it. They have the equipment and it should be there responsibility to monitor it. don't listen to these politicians trying to support it. Ask the engineering community if it is safe. don't listen to a commercial about a bill or a politician support for it. anyone paying for you to hear something is not a creditable source.
ReplyDeleteAlaska Gas Pipeline is estimated at $40 billion and although it isn't under construction...from everything Gov. Palin says the majority of the lower 48 would assume so.
ReplyDeleteTo correct one comment... the Australian Govt $43bn (Australian) is not Fibre to the NODE, but Fibre to the PREMISES. More ambitious
ReplyDeleteI love it when people say "Mark my words ..." and then sign their comment "Anonymous". One of history's most-quoted people: "Anon"
ReplyDeleteI THINK THE CRACK INDUSTRY JUST IN THE U.S IS LARGER THAN MOST OF THESE PROJECTS
ReplyDeleteI live outside of the great city of Boston and drive in all of the time and after seeing sketches and renderings of what the big dig is supposed to look like finished I can not agree with you that it is finished. Maybe the tunnel is finished but in no way is the big dig construction finished.
ReplyDeleteCyber crime generates AUD 126 Billion each year globally. Making it more profitable than the illegal drug trade. - SOURCE: Verisign - Now... just because verisign made the statment must make it true ;)
ReplyDeleteOn a side note, I'm more of a fan of toasted sandwiches than plain meat.
I think you forgot Project Manhattan! even though the project's cost was approximately 2Bil USD, but its equivalent to 22Bil USD today! employing 130,000 personnel, i would say that's one hell of a project!
ReplyDeleteI like meat sandwiches too. Especially roast pork!
ReplyDelete